April 16, 2008 is National Healthcare Decisions Day. No one in the U.S. will be able to open a paper, watch TV, view the internet, see a physician or lawyer, or go to a health care facility without being confronted with the topic of healthcare decision making. Everyone can benefit from thinking about what their healthcare choices would be if they are unable to speak for themselves, but as Christians what does this mean for us and what are our denominations views on end of life care?
As sited by the ELCA Church Council on November 9, 1992, ELCA members, congregations, and institutions need to address decisions about dying that are morally acceptable and which ones go beyond morally acceptable limits through prayer and careful reflection.
They go on to state that our faith as Christians informs and guides us in approaching personal and public decisions about death and dying today. Among the convictions that orient us are:
· Life is a gift from God, to be received with thanksgiving;
· The integrity of the life processes which God has created should be respected; both birth and death are part of these life processes;
· Both living and dying should occur within a caring community;
· A Christian perspective mandates respect for each person; such respect includes giving due recognition to each person’s carefully considered preferences regarding treatment decisions;
· Truthfulness and faithfulness in our relations with others are essential to the texture of human life; and,
· Hope and meaning in life are possible even in times of suffering and adversity; a truth powerfully proclaimed resurrection faith of the church.
“Whether we live or whether we die, we are the Lords’” (Rom 14:8). For those who live with this confidence, neither life nor death is absolute. We treasure God’s gift of life; we also prepare ourselves for a time when we may let go of our lives, entrusting our future to the crucified and risen Christ who is “Lord of both the dead and the living” (Rom 14:9).
Some basic approaches regarding end of life decisions as outlined by the ELCA are in regards to artificially administered nutrition and hydration, refusal of treatment, and physician assisted death.
When medical judgment determines that artificially administered nutrition and hydration will not contribute to an improvement in the patient’s underlying condition or prevent death from that condition patients or their legal spokespersons may consider them unduly burdensome and may be morally responsible to withhold or withdraw them and allow death to occur. Relieve from suffering, physical comfort, and assurance of God’s enduring love will continue.
Because competent patients are the prime decision makers, they may refuse treatment recommended by health care professionals when they do not believe the benefits outweigh the risks and burdens. This is also the care for patients who are incompetent but who have identified their wishes through advance directives, living wills, and/or conversations with family or designated surrogates.
The deliberate action of a physician to take the life of a patient, even when this is the patient’s wish is a different matter. As a church we affirm that deliberately destroying life created in the image of God is contrary to our Christian conscience. Caring treatment that allows death to occur within the bounds of what is morally acceptable may help reduce the appeal of physician assisted death.
Advance directives are welcome means to foster responsible decisions at the end of life. Below is a list of resources to help you make, discuss and document future healthcare wishes and decisions.
· AARP End of Life Planning
· Aging with Dignity: Five Wishes Order online or call 850-681-2010
· American Bar Association: Tool kit for health Care Advance Planning
· American Health Lawyers Association
· American Hospital Association
· Caring Connections free state specific advance directives download free or call 800-658-8898
· Center for Practical Bioethics
· Speak with your healthcare provider
· Contact your Parish Nurse